Neo-liberal restructuring in Europe has come up against its internal
contradictions. It has reached its limits. Germany’s export strategy, based on
cuts in wages and working conditions, cannot be replicated by everybody else.
If one country has such a drastic surplus in trade, others must absorb these
products. Even more severely, the Eurozone crisis has highlighted the
unevenness of the European political economy. Super-profits reaped in core
countries such as Germany were re-invested in state bonds of peripheral
countries only in order to purchase yet more goods from the core. This circle
could not go on forever and there is no potential solution from within
neo-liberalism able to cope with this crisis (see Europe
and the limits of neo-liberalism).
In this post, I will assess several potential future developments including
an extended period of muddling through based on increasingly authoritarian rule
in the periphery, a right-wing xenophobic backlash as well as progressive
responses moving us beyond neo-liberal restructuring.
While neo-liberalism has no solutions at its disposal to solve the
current crisis of the Eurozone and sovereign debt, this does not imply that it
will automatically collapse. On the contrary, a potentially rather lengthy
period of continuing muddling through is well possible. The Fiscal Compact of
the EU prescribing austerity across Europe is the key here. In countries in
Europe’s core, this implies severe cuts to public services and a further
restructuring of the state. The UK is a good example in this respect. The
health service is cut back, restructured and partly privatised, higher
education is increasingly commodified through the introduction of exorbitant
fees of up to £9000 per year, disability entitlements are further restricted,
the list could go on. At the same time, the overall wealth available is still
considerable. People will be pushed out of society with some from poorer
backgrounds, for example, no longer able to access University education. In
general, however, while inequality rises yet further, large parts of the
population still live in good enough conditions to continue going along with
the system. Hence, a coalition government of Conservatives and Liberal Democrats,
pursuing many policies which the previous Labour government had actually initiated,
is sufficient in the political arena to carry through the savage cut-backs. And
when there is social unrest by those who are excluded from the benefits of the
core, who in other words constitute a social periphery within the core, such as
during the riots in the summer of 2011, then enough police is at hand to
‘maintain order’ supported by judges, who hand out draconian punishment.
Resistance movements to the cuts, as for example the Coalition of Resistance,
find it difficult to mobilise more widely against budgetary restraint, often
supported by slogans in the media such as ‘we are all in the same boat and have
to contribute our bit’.
The situation differs, however, in the periphery of Europe. Here, cuts
have been so severe that they have put many people to their existential limits.
In Athens, soup kitchens are busy to provide meals on a daily basis to an
increasing number of impoverished citizens. Here, a grand coalition of the
centre-right party New Democracy and the centre-left party PASOK, which had
dominated Greek politics for decades, was defeated in parliamentary elections
on 6 May 2012. More and more police has to be deployed on the street to
maintain public order, technocratic government has replaced democracy (see ‘Who
is in Charge? Democracy versus Technocracy’). In general, a move towards authoritarian
neo-liberalism can be identified with the clear objective to secure the
privileges of capital and the rich against workers and the poor.
And yet, it is
also the periphery, where potential alternative developments are in the process
of emerging. First, there is the clear risk of a move towards a nationalistic,
xenophobic right. The success of the fascist, neo-nazi party Golden Dawn in
Greece, which entered parliament with almost 7 per cent of the votes on 6 May,
confirms this danger. Not all resistance against neo-liberal restructuring will
automatically be progressive. On the other hand, progressive alternatives too
may emerge in Europe’s periphery. Here, the question of whether Greece should
leave the Euro or should stay and push for a re-arrangement of its set-up is
secondary in my view. What is more decisive is the push for solutions, which go
beyond neo-liberal capitalism at the national as well as European level. As a
primary precondition for a radical left alternative, the balance of power
between capital and labour has to be shifted back towards labour. This requires
first that all left groupings overcome their internal differences and join
forces together with trade unions and other social movements. Second, control
over the financial system has to be re-established including the
nationalization of banks. As capital movements have outgrown national levels,
it is the European level, where controls of the financial system have to be
re-established. Third, public debt needs to be audited and to a large extent
written off. Fourth, the redistribution of wealth from workers to capital has
to be turned around through a general focus on increasing wages across the EU.
Finally, tax evasion by large corporations must be tackled and so-called tax
havens closed.
Such a
progressive, radical left alternative will not emerge by itself, but only
through struggle. And while the spark of this struggle may be lit in the
periphery (see Uneven
and combined development and the issue of resistance in the UK!), there can
be no justification for us in the core to sit back and watch passively how
developments unfold. Restructuring affects our workplaces and our societies too
and it is here where we through active involvement in resistance can show our
solidarity with the people in Greece.
Prof. Andreas Bieler
Professor of Political Economy
University of Nottingham/UK
Andreas.Bieler@nottingham.ac.uk
Personal website: http://www.andreasbieler.net
5 June 2012
Many people said, that Euro Zone will soon fall apart, since Greece is planning to leave. I think they are wrong, as we know, that the United States will take Greece's place in the Euro Zone.
ReplyDeleteBy: exchange rates