When
the Irish government decided in 2013 first to establish the company Irish Water
and then introduce water charges for users in order to comply with obligations
of the Memorandum of Understanding with the EU over its bailout agreement,
resistance erupted across the Republic. While resistance against austerity had
been isolated and sporadic in Ireland until then, a large, national level
movement emerged in 2014. Water had been the straw, which broke the camel’s
neck. In this blog post, based on interviews conducted during field research in
Ireland between 25 February and 2 March 2018, I will analyse the broad alliance
underpinning this movement as well as the specific strategies employed.
Tuesday 20 March 2018
Friday 16 March 2018
UCU’s ‘Syriza moment’: Putting university managements on notice!
Despite
strong support from the Greek people, in July 2015 the Greek government by Alexis
Tsipras gave in and accepted major further austerity measures in exchange for a
third bailout agreement with the Troika, consisting of the European Commission,
the European Central Bank and the IMF (The
Guardian, 13 July 2015). Against the background of a bitter dispute over
cuts employers in British Higher Education (HE) want to impose on the USS
pension scheme in pre-1992 universities (see Britain: Universities on Strike), here too, UCU negotiators felt they
had no other option but to accept an agreement, which involved major cuts (see UCU
‘agreement’, 12 March 2018). Nevertheless, pushed by its members, UCU
ultimately did not buckle and rejected the ‘agreement’. In this blog post, I
will analyse the underlying reasons for this different outcome.
Sunday 11 March 2018
Asserting power: The political economy of USS pension fund valuations.
The
University and College Union (UCU) and the employers’ organisation of pre-1992
Higher Education institutions UUK are currently involved in an industrial
conflict over plans by the employers to impose draconian cuts to the USS
pension scheme. At the heart of the conflict is the valuation of the fund in
2017 by USS, apparently revealing a large deficit of about £6 billion, which
needs to be addressed. In this post, I do not want to engage in economics
arguments over how big the deficit actually is. Rather, I will focus on a
political economy analysis of the actual struggle over who is in charge
determining the criteria for the valuation in the first place. The valuation of
the health of the fund is not an objective, economic task. It is ultimately a
political decision on how to estimate the risk and especially on how to spread
the risk across staff and employers
Thursday 8 March 2018
Striking for USS: four ways university managements have misjudged the situation.
The
University and College Union (UCU) and
the employers’ association for pre-1992 institutions UUK are currently locked into a
bitter battle over pensions in the UK Higher Education sector. Overall 14 days
of strike action have been scheduled for February and March (see Lecturers
on strike). To the surprise of the employers, support for lecturers on
strike has been strong resulting in a fragmentation of UUK. The University of
Oxford is only the latest in a line of universities changing their position (The
Guardian, 7 March 2018). In this blog post, I will identify four ways in
which the employers have seriously misjudged the situation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)