From the
early 1980s onwards workers’ rights across Europe have been greatly cut back,
especially with regards to collective bargaining and trade unions’ involvement
in government decision-making. GDP kept growing, but the distribution has been
so uneven that many people have lost out as a result. Is there an alternative
to this that might lead to greater social equality? I was recently interviewed
by the Italian online magazine ytali.
We discussed neo-liberal restructuring across the EU, the related increasing
social inequality, the rise of nationalism and potential progressive
alternatives underpinned by social justice. I argued that “organised labour has
realised it needs a much broader agenda to stay relevant, so it is starting to
participate on issues such as water, energy and democracy”.
Professor Bieler, as you have
written on several occasions, the project of European integration involved a
restructuring of the organisation of production on the continent. Who are the
winners and who are the losers of this process?
It’s
really part of the restructuring of globalization. Especially from the early 1980s
onwards, production structures have been increasingly transnationalised in
Europe and across the world. And that has resulted in the emergence of what
some refer to as a transnational capitalist class, which has become an
increasingly important actor and ultimately underpinned the shift towards neoliberal
economic policies.
Photo by habeebee |
Now, everyone
looks at Germany as an economic powerhouse, but actually the increase in
precarious contracts in Germany is one of the highest in Europe; there may be
some economic upturn at the general GDP level, but the distribution has been so
uneven that many people have lost out as a result.
You mentioned neoliberal economic
policies. I would say that in Europe the dominant alternative to those seems to
be nationalism. What are the main differences and similarities between these
two “doctrines”?
The
austerity cutbacks people have been suffering from ever since the global
financial crisis derive from neoliberalism, which has resulted in massive
unemployment, the situation in Italy being a key example. People are fed-up and
extremely worried about their livelihood and their future, but this does not
automatically imply that as a result you would have a progressive left
strategy, vis-à-vis capitalism or neoliberalism.
Quite the
opposite, we see forces on the right, with nationalist and even anti-foreigner
rhetoric, who abuse the current crisis to further their own interests. Nationalism
cannot be a progressive force, but it is an increasingly strong one at the
moment. At first sight, nationalism contradicts neoliberalism which of course advocates
open borders and free movement; but at a deeper level, if we look at the Brexit
argument in the UK for example, those conservative figures who say they “want
to take control of our borders” are often representatives of neoliberal
capital. And I think the latter struggles to offer the gains they had promised,
making the people more restless in turn. It has become a strategy of sorts to
carry on with neoliberal economics and keep borders open for the movement of
capital, while blaming foreigners for the resulting problems by playing the
nationalist card as a way of ‘distracting’ those, who have lost out. Unfortunately,
then, this right-wing nationalism is not a contradiction to neoliberalism.
There is also
a small group on the left that argues that the UK outside the EU would find it
easier to establish socialist policies internally, and that variety of
nationalism would in theory be in contradiction to neoliberalism. That said, I
don’t think it’s realistic to pursue this strategy today, when economies have
become so tightly integrated across borders.
Photo by habeebee |
Apart from this specific case, is there in Europe an alternative to neoliberalism that
might lead to greater wealth distribution and social equality?
It’s
always possible, the future depends on class struggle after all. Back in
2002, I participated in the European Social Forum in Florence, where there were
between 40 and 60 thousand activists together. That was the high-point for the
left in Europe, and one could feel the hope for a left alternative. If we look
at what has happened since then, we have less reason to be optimistic.
In
November of last year [2018], I attended the Bilbao European Forum, organised
by European left parties with some green and Marxist movements too, and there
were only 450 participants. So, the prospects of an alternative left are not
very promising at the moment, but there is no reason to give up.
Which struggles should a new left
begin to tackle first?
Struggles
around public water such as the 2011 referendum in Italy are very encouraging.
There has been a European citizens’ initiative on water as a human right in
2012/2013, as well as a successful fight in Ireland against water charges in
2014-15. So, water is one of those areas of successful mobilisation on a national,
European and global level.
Another
hopeful example would be the Stop TTIP [the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment
Partnership] campaign, where there was also a wide mobilisation of trade unions
and movements across Europe.
So there
are struggles in which the left comes together. They give some hope for a
future progressive alternative to neoliberalism.
Photo by ytali |
Could the environment, as big a
topic as it is, become a northern star around which the left can build a new strategy?
If the
left wants to be successful in challenging the dominant system, it needs to
incorporate all types of different actors, trade unions, social movements, NGOs.
If, however, trade unions narrowly focus only on issues to protect their own
members’ interests then that becomes an obstacle to wider organisation.
Fortunately,
many trade unions have realised that they need a much broader
agenda to stay relevant, so they are starting to participate actively on issues
external to their realm, such as policies on water or energy democracy. These
are all issues which also relate to the environment and here especially the
problem of climate change.
With regards to the yellow vests in
France, bringing together different interests is both its greatest strength but
also its main weakness. How do you think this movement might evolve to achieve
the changes it strives for?
I’m no
expert on the yellow vest movement, but it seems to be a protest against the
continuation of austerity policies by President Macron. A protest by those who
have lost out during the process of European integration. There are some very
progressive elements next to other xenophobic populist forces as part of the
yellow vests, so finding a common ground of demands is extremely challenging.
What is
clear is the unrest felt by a vast number of people, who find it increasingly
difficult to lead a meaningful life because of the economic cuts.
It remains
to be seen whether they are going to be a progressive force or not.
Photo by habeebee |
It would
certainly be better to have basic income than to rely on austerity measures and
precarious jobs, but to have a truly fundamental shift other changes would have
to come into play. There is more than enough wealth being created, it’s a
distribution problem. A larger problem still is the way production is being
organised, based as it is on a race to the bottom with precarious contracts.
Ultimately, however utopic it may sound, it would be necessary to step beyond
the capitalist social relations of production and to have the ownership of the
means of production socialised.
In the
absence of that, universal basic income might be a way forward. Going back to
the 5 Stelle Movement, it has some progressive ideas but it is also populist
with anti-foreign rhetoric seeping into their agenda. So I’m not really sure
how to describe them or how to relate to them.
You mentioned organisation of
production as being key to employment. Considering that in the 1980s centres of
production in Europe de-localised to peripheral countries, what can be done
today to improve such organisation?
The first
thing, at the European level, is to harmonise corporate tax rates. It doesn’t
get rid of capitalism but it would increase control over those corporations,
and the fact that this hasn’t happened yet just goes to show how powerful they
are.
Another
step towards a more progressive future would be to re-empower trade unions and
that also depends on how trade unions themselves are able to respond more
flexibly to the current situation. There are small ones here in the UK, such as
United Voices of the World, which has managed to organise migrant cleaners in
London in a very challenging, informal environment.
Then there
are various examples, in Italy, Greece and France, where workers have taken
over their factories. It would be ideal to see governments support such
experiments with proper legislation.
Photo by ytali |
Trade unions in Italy seem to be doomed as they represent people with long-term contracts, whereas the new workforce in the labour market only has short-term ones and, importantly, is far from that ideological culture of “let’s all push together towards the same goal.” What, then, could trade unions do to reinvent themselves?
Current
success often comes from small trade unions such as USB or Cobas in Italy, and
the challenge is to translate that success at the local level to the whole
country. Trade unions at the national level remain very important. Unfortunately,
many still think that as long as they are in discussions with the state and
employers in tripartite institutions, they continue to exercise power, but they
have forgotten that the creation of those institutions was the result of
successful struggles in the past. So rather than discussing with employers and
the state within these institutions, trade unions
should first go back to their members, re-organise the rank and file through
struggles, and only then re-engage with the state and employers.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments welcome!