The
economic message is clear. Not confronting climate change will be extremely
costly. ‘The cost of inaction will massively outweigh the costs of action.’ Nevertheless,
when it comes to solutions the focus is almost exclusively on better regulation.
We should set new (market) rules to ensure that polluters pay, while ‘green
companies’ are rewarded. As if all that were necessary would be simply to
adjust the rules of the ‘free market’, and the rest would sort itself out.
So-called ‘green new deals’ focusing on a stronger state involvement were not
mentioned, the already existing community-based alternatives such as local
energy grids based on renewables or different forms of housing and heating were
overlooked. (For existing community-based alternatives, see the Avoiding
the apocalypse lecture series by Alan Simpson.) And this, although we
know for well that it is exactly the capitalist ‘free market’ with its
exclusive focus on profit-maximisation, which fuels relentless ecological
destruction.
The
discussion of transport is equally disappointing. Rather than emphasising the
importance of an expanded public transport system, the main recommendation is a
shift towards electric vehicles. The fact that we simply do not have the
necessary resources for expanding individual transport along this line is
missed.
The
military-security analysis too is highly problematic. Declaring climate change
an issue of national security, a ‘threat multiplier’ is one thing. What is not
mentioned, however, is the fact that the military and defence related
manufacturing are one of the biggest global polluters, ‘producing 5.5.% of
total global emissions’ (CEDARE
2025).
Unsurprisingly, the US military is earth’s greatest polluter. See the
documentary Earth’s Greatest
Enemy
by Abby Martin and Mike Prysner. Not to forget either that increasing arms
manufacturing draws on finances desperately needed to confront the ecological
crisis in the first place. The People’s Emergency Briefing is silent on these issues.
Finally, the whole documentary is a very Western-centric, even UK centric analysis. A shift to electric vehicles as the more general shift to renewable energy as a whole requires batteries based on lithium. The mining of lithium in countries of the Global South results in massive sacrifice zones (BBC, 25 July 2025). Other essential raw materials including cobalt come from conflict regions such as the Republic of Congo, fuelling further wars (ABC, 22 February 2022). Our potential transition in the Global North is paid for by the non-transition and higher pollution levels of others in the Global South. The People’s Emergency Briefing lacks a global vision.
Viewers
leave the film with the understanding that if we change the rules of the
market, vote for the right political parties and buy an electric vehicle, we
will be fine. No more drastic changes to production and consumption patterns
are needed. We in the UK can carry on living exactly as we are.
The
widespread screening indicates that people are willing to listen and eager to
learn. Ultimately, however, the documentary falls short of providing any
realistic way forward. A missed opportunity!
Andreas Bieler
16 September 2026

No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments welcome!