Drawing on his article 'The Labour governments 1974–1979: social democracy abandoned?’, recently published in
the academic journal British Politics,
in this guest post Max Crook
questions the view that the Labour government in office from 1974 to 1979
started the transition to neo-liberalism in the UK. He, thus, challenges
structural approaches to social democratic decline. In his focus on electoral politics, he makes two key
claims: Firstly, Labour did not abandon the social democratic postwar
consensus. Any fundamental challenge to it remained politically unthinkable.
Secondly, the eventual collapse of the consensus was not the product of
structural changes in the global economy, but was the highly contingent outcome
of an electorally motivated gamble.
Thursday, 7 June 2018
Tuesday, 15 May 2018
Global Capitalism. Global War. Global Crisis: new research monograph published.
Global
Capitalism. Global War. Global Crisis. How can these conditions be
understood in terms of their internal relationship so as to capture capital’s
connection to the states-system of uneven and combined development, social
reproduction, and the contradictions facing humanity within world-ecology?
These are the puzzles Adam David Morton and I are investigating in our recently published book with Cambridge University
Press.
Tuesday, 8 May 2018
Greece under the Troika: colonialism and resistance in the 21st century - the struggle for public water.
When in May 2014 98 per cent of
Thessaloniki’s citizens voted against the privatisation of their municipal
water company EYATH and the Greek constitutional court, the Council of State,
ruled out the privatisation of Athens’ water company EYDAP as unconstitutional
shortly afterwards, the public ownership of these two companies seemed to have
been secured (see Resisting
water privatisation in Greece and Portugal). And yet, when the Syriza
government signed the third bailout agreement of Greece in July 2015, the
privatisation of water was back on the agenda. In this blog post, I will report
on the struggle over public water since July 2015, based on a set of
semi-structured interviews with water activists in Thessaloniki and Athens in
April 2018.
Sunday, 29 April 2018
Serving the interests of capital: the role of economics as an academic discipline.
![]() |
| Photo by 401 (K) 2012 |
Sunday, 15 April 2018
The historical origins of Colombia’s FARC: class struggle towards ‘La Violencia’.
In this guest post, Oliver Dodd analyses changes to Colombia’s political economy in the
period preceding the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia’s (FARC) founding
to reveal the organisation’s historical roots. He argues that processes of
political economic development in Colombia did not take place in an orderly and
steady manner, but rather involved conflict and antagonism between various
social-class forces engaged in a struggle for hegemony. Ultimately, Colombia’s
economic development encouraged the spread of political terror, which was
sponsored politically largely by Conservatives to combat the threat of a
growing independent labour movement. In turn, this trajectory of violence
permitted the Communist Party to establish ‘safe communities’ eventually
resulting in FARC’s founding.
Tuesday, 20 March 2018
‘We shall strike, we shall fight, water is a human right!’ Defending public water in Ireland.
When
the Irish government decided in 2013 first to establish the company Irish Water
and then introduce water charges for users in order to comply with obligations
of the Memorandum of Understanding with the EU over its bailout agreement,
resistance erupted across the Republic. While resistance against austerity had
been isolated and sporadic in Ireland until then, a large, national level
movement emerged in 2014. Water had been the straw, which broke the camel’s
neck. In this blog post, based on interviews conducted during field research in
Ireland between 25 February and 2 March 2018, I will analyse the broad alliance
underpinning this movement as well as the specific strategies employed.
Friday, 16 March 2018
UCU’s ‘Syriza moment’: Putting university managements on notice!
Despite
strong support from the Greek people, in July 2015 the Greek government by Alexis
Tsipras gave in and accepted major further austerity measures in exchange for a
third bailout agreement with the Troika, consisting of the European Commission,
the European Central Bank and the IMF (The
Guardian, 13 July 2015). Against the background of a bitter dispute over
cuts employers in British Higher Education (HE) want to impose on the USS
pension scheme in pre-1992 universities (see Britain: Universities on Strike), here too, UCU negotiators felt they
had no other option but to accept an agreement, which involved major cuts (see UCU
‘agreement’, 12 March 2018). Nevertheless, pushed by its members, UCU
ultimately did not buckle and rejected the ‘agreement’. In this blog post, I
will analyse the underlying reasons for this different outcome.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







