The global wage earning class today may be
estimated to 2.5 to 3 billion. Among these 5 to 7.6 per cent are unionized. In
a core capitalist like the USA the share has shrunk from 30 per cent in 1960 to
11.8 per cent in 2009, in Germany from 34.7 per cent to 18.6 per cent. Strike
activity and support for the historical working class parties have also gone
down. In this guest post, Knut Kjeldstadli
from the Transnational Labour Project in Oslo reflects on the possibilities of establishing solidarity across borders.
These sombre numbers were recently presented at
a workshop on transnational unionism organized by the Transnational Labour Project group at CAS, Centre for Advanced Study in Oslo. The traditional labour movement formed by industrial
capitalism may be said to be in a state of crisis in huge parts of the world.
Yet, the participants could also tell about counter movements, about successful
attempts of establishing tariff agreements and of creating new forms of
organization. The Argentinian CTA, which organizes wage earners, the unemployed
as well as people who formally are independent workers, is one example. And new
trade unions, which one conventionally might expect to be timid, show a high
degree of militancy. One example is the Polish nurses’ union which in 2007 occupied
the prime minister’s office for eight days, and when evicted, staged a tent
camp for four weeks in the centre of Warsaw.
While capital has become global, trade unions
to a large extent have remained national. Now, sufficiently strong unions form
the necessary base for a forceful transnational activity. But in addition
unions have to – against high odds – be able to meet the opponents at the same
global level. And examples of such victorious fights were also presented at the
Oslo seminar.
Solidarity work, where resources are
transmitted from a stronger partner to those in need of support, is one form.
One example is the 1997 campaign for the right to organize and enter into
agreements at the American division of United Parcel Service. Their strike was
supported by UPS employees in other countries, who refused to distribute parcels
from the USA. Another example is from clothes sellers Hennes & Mauritz, where
the union in the Swedish division pressurized the corporation management, who
in their turn instructed the American management to accept a deal. A four nation
network with links to the small peasants’ organization La Via Campesina
cooperates with seasonal agricultural workers to organize.
Such support may rest on consumer power. The
American clothes producer Russell sells college sweaters. The conditions in
their factories in Honduras were appalling. A campaign in 2009 against ordering
sweaters from Russell comprised 100 American universities, and also Canadian
and British universities. By using this
type of collective buying power the campaign managed to press successfully for
the right to unionize and a tariff agreement, a full victory.
Another type of transnational activity is
coordinated actions. In 2005 South American unions, social movements and left
orientated governments gathered into a huge campaign against the US-led plan for
a Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA). The alliance was called the Southern
Hemispheric Alliance. The campaign succeeded. And yet one has to add that the USA
later entered into a range of bilateral trade agreements on free trade instead.
In November 2012 there were coordinated strikes in Greece, Italy, France, Spain
and Portugal against the present austerity policy. The strike was combined with
other forms of resistance – such as consumers’ boycott; orange ribbons were
carried by those who could not strike, but wanted to demonstrate the support, theatre
groups made performances, street theatre, road blocks and cyber-attacks at
public web sites.
Finally there is cooperation based on common
interests. A dockers’ campaign against a new EU directive led to victory in
2003. In 2012-2013 workers in Thessaloniki occupied a factory, supported by
various radical networks. When similar occupations were carried out in Milano,
Rome and Marseilles, they benefited from exchanging experiences. When the
security guards in the American division of the giant corporation G4S wanted to
unionize, the union brought the fight outside USA – putting pressure on
investors, monitoring the companies etc. And tariff agreements were struck in
almost ten countries where none had existed before.
More examples were presented at the seminar.
Counter forces and internal differences in the world’s working class make
transnational solidarity difficult – but not impossible. Many groups have
managed to find what is common among differences, to go from the local and
special to the general. Solidarity may be
built across borders.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments welcome!